<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 435 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449284</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, remanding the matter back to the Adjudicating Authority. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of verifying whether the principal manufacturer paid duty on the total value of the final product, including the value of free materials supplied. The case was returned for a fresh order to ensure compliance with the precedent requiring such verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 07:20:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 435 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449284</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, remanding the matter back to the Adjudicating Authority. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of verifying whether the principal manufacturer paid duty on the total value of the final product, including the value of free materials supplied. The case was returned for a fresh order to ensure compliance with the precedent requiring such verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>