<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 430 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449279</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal filed by the Appellant. It held that the demand for Central Excise duty, along with interest, was unsustainable. The Tribunal clarified that the value of goods cleared on payment of normal duty should not be included in computing the value of clearances up to Rs. 100 lakhs under Notification 9/2000. Since the duty demand was not sustainable, the imposition of a penalty was also deemed unnecessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 05:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 430 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449279</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal filed by the Appellant. It held that the demand for Central Excise duty, along with interest, was unsustainable. The Tribunal clarified that the value of goods cleared on payment of normal duty should not be included in computing the value of clearances up to Rs. 100 lakhs under Notification 9/2000. Since the duty demand was not sustainable, the imposition of a penalty was also deemed unnecessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>