https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312255 Concurrent findings on the purpose for which expenditure was incurred were upheld, and no basis was found to disturb the Tribunal's and High Court's conclusions. The Court therefore declined appellate interference and left the impugned judgments undisturbed. Delay in filing the Special Leave Petition was also condoned, allowing the matter to be heard on merits before the petitions and civil appeals were ultimately dismissed. en-us Wed, 16 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Jun 2026 11:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312255 Concurrent findings on the purpose for which expenditure was incurred were upheld, and no basis was found to disturb the Tribunal's and High Court's conclusions. The Court therefore declined appellate interference and left the impugned judgments undisturbed. Delay in filing the Special Leave Petition was also condoned, allowing the matter to be heard on merits before the petitions and civil appeals were ultimately dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 16 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312255