<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1717 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312253</link>
    <description>A special limitation period under Section 74(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 provides sixty days from the award, with a further extension of up to sixty days on sufficient cause. Because this is a self-contained special law, Section 5 of the Limitation Act does not apply. However, Section 29(2) does not bar the operation of Sections 4, 12, 13 and 14, so time may still be excluded while computing limitation unless expressly prohibited. On the stated facts, the appeal remained time-barred even after applying those exclusion principles, and the delay explanation was inadequate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2024 18:14:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1717 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312253</link>
      <description>A special limitation period under Section 74(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 provides sixty days from the award, with a further extension of up to sixty days on sufficient cause. Because this is a self-contained special law, Section 5 of the Limitation Act does not apply. However, Section 29(2) does not bar the operation of Sections 4, 12, 13 and 14, so time may still be excluded while computing limitation unless expressly prohibited. On the stated facts, the appeal remained time-barred even after applying those exclusion principles, and the delay explanation was inadequate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>