<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 1178 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312248</link>
    <description>ITAT Bangalore ruled on multiple transfer pricing and tax issues. The tribunal restored several claims to AO/TPO for fresh examination including treatment of construction contract provisions as non-operating, leverage consideration, and margin computation errors. For trading segment, tribunal directed adoption of operating profit/operating revenue as profit level indicator. Management and marketing fees were ordered to be treated as operating costs allocated proportionally. Section 14A disallowance was restricted to 10% of exempt dividend income since Rule 8D couldn&#039;t apply with nil opening/closing investment values. TDS credit, education cess deduction, and dividend distribution tax rate issues were restored to AO for examination following relevant judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2024 18:14:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 1178 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312248</link>
      <description>ITAT Bangalore ruled on multiple transfer pricing and tax issues. The tribunal restored several claims to AO/TPO for fresh examination including treatment of construction contract provisions as non-operating, leverage consideration, and margin computation errors. For trading segment, tribunal directed adoption of operating profit/operating revenue as profit level indicator. Management and marketing fees were ordered to be treated as operating costs allocated proportionally. Section 14A disallowance was restricted to 10% of exempt dividend income since Rule 8D couldn&#039;t apply with nil opening/closing investment values. TDS credit, education cess deduction, and dividend distribution tax rate issues were restored to AO for examination following relevant judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>