<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Detention of Goods for Incomplete E-Way Bill Part B Deemed Unsustainable Without Intent to Evade Taxes.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74748</link>
    <description>Detention of goods - penalty order - Part B of the E-Way Bill was not filled up - The High court observed that the department failed to prove any intention on the petitioner&#039;s part to evade tax and noted previous judgments directly relevant to the case. - Given the technical nature of the defect and the absence of intent to evade tax, the court found the penalty imposed u/s 129(3) of the Act unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2024 15:24:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2024 15:24:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742941" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Detention of Goods for Incomplete E-Way Bill Part B Deemed Unsustainable Without Intent to Evade Taxes.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74748</link>
      <description>Detention of goods - penalty order - Part B of the E-Way Bill was not filled up - The High court observed that the department failed to prove any intention on the petitioner&#039;s part to evade tax and noted previous judgments directly relevant to the case. - Given the technical nature of the defect and the absence of intent to evade tax, the court found the penalty imposed u/s 129(3) of the Act unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2024 15:24:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>