<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 427 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449276</link>
    <description>HC examined whether royalty payment for sand mining constitutes GST or tax. Petitioner argued royalty is tax, referencing SC precedent in India Cement Ltd. case. HC granted leave to amend petition details and maintained stay on GST payment for mining lease/royalty pending further judicial determination, aligning with ongoing SC case M/s Lakhwinder Singh vs. Union of India &amp;amp; Ors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 17:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 427 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449276</link>
      <description>HC examined whether royalty payment for sand mining constitutes GST or tax. Petitioner argued royalty is tax, referencing SC precedent in India Cement Ltd. case. HC granted leave to amend petition details and maintained stay on GST payment for mining lease/royalty pending further judicial determination, aligning with ongoing SC case M/s Lakhwinder Singh vs. Union of India &amp;amp; Ors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>