<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 413 - COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449262</link>
    <description>The SC reviewed an anti-profiteering case involving ticket pricing after GST rate reduction. The CCI found no evidence of profiteering, concluding the Respondent had appropriately passed GST benefits to customers. The investigation revealed contradictory reports, and ultimately, the proceedings against the Respondent were dropped, with no violation of CGST Act, 2017 anti-profiteering provisions established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 17:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 413 - COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449262</link>
      <description>The SC reviewed an anti-profiteering case involving ticket pricing after GST rate reduction. The CCI found no evidence of profiteering, concluding the Respondent had appropriately passed GST benefits to customers. The investigation revealed contradictory reports, and ultimately, the proceedings against the Respondent were dropped, with no violation of CGST Act, 2017 anti-profiteering provisions established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>