<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 411 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449260</link>
    <description>The SC upheld the HC&#039;s decision to dismiss the appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act due to delay, finding the explanation provided by the CIT insufficient to justify the delay. The SC dismissed the special leave petition(s), stating there was no merit or need for interference, and disposed of any pending applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 11:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 411 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449260</link>
      <description>The SC upheld the HC&#039;s decision to dismiss the appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act due to delay, finding the explanation provided by the CIT insufficient to justify the delay. The SC dismissed the special leave petition(s), stating there was no merit or need for interference, and disposed of any pending applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>