<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Rules Advance Payment for Share Purchase Not Financial Debt; Application Dismissed Due to Limitation Period.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74721</link>
    <description>Initiation of CIRP u/s 7 of the IBC - financial debt or not - Period of limitation - Advance paid subject to execution of the share purchase agreement - NCLT rejected the application as the appellant does not falling within the category of financial creditor - The tribunal highlighted that the transaction was ostensibly for the purchase of a specific property, and the appellant should have asserted its rights within the stipulated three-year period. Since no default date was established, and the transaction did not meet the criteria of financial debt, the tribunal upheld the order of NCLT.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2024 08:11:36 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2024 08:11:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Rules Advance Payment for Share Purchase Not Financial Debt; Application Dismissed Due to Limitation Period.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74721</link>
      <description>Initiation of CIRP u/s 7 of the IBC - financial debt or not - Period of limitation - Advance paid subject to execution of the share purchase agreement - NCLT rejected the application as the appellant does not falling within the category of financial creditor - The tribunal highlighted that the transaction was ostensibly for the purchase of a specific property, and the appellant should have asserted its rights within the stipulated three-year period. Since no default date was established, and the transaction did not meet the criteria of financial debt, the tribunal upheld the order of NCLT.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2024 08:11:36 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>