https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312229 The HC upheld the legality of the impugned order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2016-17, stating it was based on substantial evidence. The court found no procedural irregularity or violation of natural justice principles. The writ petition challenging the order was disposed of, allowing the petitioner to present its case in future proceedings. The court directed the petitioner's representative to provide a PAN card copy and instructed the assessing officer to report on the representative's business activities. en-us Mon, 08 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Feb 2024 17:58:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312229 The HC upheld the legality of the impugned order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2016-17, stating it was based on substantial evidence. The court found no procedural irregularity or violation of natural justice principles. The writ petition challenging the order was disposed of, allowing the petitioner to present its case in future proceedings. The court directed the petitioner's representative to provide a PAN card copy and instructed the assessing officer to report on the representative's business activities. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 08 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312229