<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 362 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449211</link>
    <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s challenge to tax imposition based on technical E-Way Bill address error. Court emphasized absence of mens rea and held that mere procedural mistakes should not trigger tax penalties. Order quashed, directing refund of deposited amount within one month, with consequential reliefs granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 18:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 362 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449211</link>
      <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s challenge to tax imposition based on technical E-Way Bill address error. Court emphasized absence of mens rea and held that mere procedural mistakes should not trigger tax penalties. Order quashed, directing refund of deposited amount within one month, with consequential reliefs granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>