<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 335 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449184</link>
    <description>ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against CIT&#039;s revision order u/s 263. The CIT had set aside the assessment order directing fresh assessment on issues of interest accrued to PFC, bad debts claim, and leave encashment provision. ITAT held that since CIT was satisfied with assessee&#039;s explanation regarding alleged irregularities and found no error in allowing these claims, there was no basis for exercising revisionary powers u/s 263. The tribunal emphasized that revisionary powers require finding an error causing revenue prejudice, which was absent here. Mere non-examination by AO during assessment proceedings doesn&#039;t render the order erroneous when claims are legally eligible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2024 07:15:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 335 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449184</link>
      <description>ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against CIT&#039;s revision order u/s 263. The CIT had set aside the assessment order directing fresh assessment on issues of interest accrued to PFC, bad debts claim, and leave encashment provision. ITAT held that since CIT was satisfied with assessee&#039;s explanation regarding alleged irregularities and found no error in allowing these claims, there was no basis for exercising revisionary powers u/s 263. The tribunal emphasized that revisionary powers require finding an error causing revenue prejudice, which was absent here. Mere non-examination by AO during assessment proceedings doesn&#039;t render the order erroneous when claims are legally eligible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>