https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449156 CESTAT Hyderabad dismissed Revenue's appeal challenging Commissioner's order dropping service tax demands. The tribunal upheld dismissal of Rs. 50,86,324/- demand for pre-June 2007 period as time-barred, rejected Rs. 17,84,97,162/- differential demand due to improper reclassification from residential complex construction to works contract service under Section 65A, and confirmed dropping Rs. 3,98,08,809/- demand under Section 73A for lack of evidence of tax collection without payment. Only Rs. 21,029/- GTA service demand was confirmed. en-us Tue, 06 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Feb 2024 07:13:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449156 CESTAT Hyderabad dismissed Revenue's appeal challenging Commissioner's order dropping service tax demands. The tribunal upheld dismissal of Rs. 50,86,324/- demand for pre-June 2007 period as time-barred, rejected Rs. 17,84,97,162/- differential demand due to improper reclassification from residential complex construction to works contract service under Section 65A, and confirmed dropping Rs. 3,98,08,809/- demand under Section 73A for lack of evidence of tax collection without payment. Only Rs. 21,029/- GTA service demand was confirmed. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 06 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449156