<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 303 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449152</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s civil appeal on the ground of low tax effect, noting that the matter was covered by Circular No. 17 of 2019 issued by the Department of Revenue. The dismissal was based on the stated monetary threshold for litigation and not on a determination of the substantive central excise dispute. Pending applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 14:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 303 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449152</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s civil appeal on the ground of low tax effect, noting that the matter was covered by Circular No. 17 of 2019 issued by the Department of Revenue. The dismissal was based on the stated monetary threshold for litigation and not on a determination of the substantive central excise dispute. Pending applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>