<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 299 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449148</link>
    <description>In valuation of DTA clearances by a 100% EOU through a related buyer, the prescribed Customs Valuation Rules must be applied sequentially and the department cannot bypass that scheme by resorting to Rule 7. On the facts discussed, the direct use of Rule 7 was inconsistent with the statutory valuation framework under the Central Excise and Customs provisions. The text also states that the extended limitation period requires positive material showing suppression of facts with intent to evade duty; prior departmental knowledge through audit objection and reply negated such suppression. The demand, interest and penalties were therefore treated as unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2024 05:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 299 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449148</link>
      <description>In valuation of DTA clearances by a 100% EOU through a related buyer, the prescribed Customs Valuation Rules must be applied sequentially and the department cannot bypass that scheme by resorting to Rule 7. On the facts discussed, the direct use of Rule 7 was inconsistent with the statutory valuation framework under the Central Excise and Customs provisions. The text also states that the extended limitation period requires positive material showing suppression of facts with intent to evade duty; prior departmental knowledge through audit objection and reply negated such suppression. The demand, interest and penalties were therefore treated as unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>