<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 287 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449136</link>
    <description>HC examined a challenge to registration cancellation. Authorities found the business unit non-operational and obtained through fraud. Despite receiving show cause notice, petitioner failed to provide substantive evidence refuting findings. Court upheld registration cancellation, determining no violation of natural justice principles and finding procedural requirements were correctly followed. Petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2025 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 287 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449136</link>
      <description>HC examined a challenge to registration cancellation. Authorities found the business unit non-operational and obtained through fraud. Despite receiving show cause notice, petitioner failed to provide substantive evidence refuting findings. Court upheld registration cancellation, determining no violation of natural justice principles and finding procedural requirements were correctly followed. Petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>