<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (9) TMI 12 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35710</link>
    <description>The High Court clarified that the liability to pay a sum under a court decree was allowable as a deduction as a trading liability, separate from litigation expenses. The court found that the liability, arising from a dispute with selling agents after taking over assets and liabilities, was indeed a trading liability of the assessee. The timing of the liability was not a key issue, as the focus was on its classification. Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining the liability as a trading liability without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:22:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (9) TMI 12 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35710</link>
      <description>The High Court clarified that the liability to pay a sum under a court decree was allowable as a deduction as a trading liability, separate from litigation expenses. The court found that the liability, arising from a dispute with selling agents after taking over assets and liabilities, was indeed a trading liability of the assessee. The timing of the liability was not a key issue, as the focus was on its classification. Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining the liability as a trading liability without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>