<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 267 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449116</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal in two matters. First, regarding weighted deduction u/s 35(2AB), assessee furnished Form 3CL from DSIR during appellate proceedings. CIT(A) allowed weighted deduction for approved expenditure and permitted remaining R&amp;amp;D expenses as revenue expenditure u/s 37. ITAT upheld this decision. Second, concerning addition u/s 68 for unsecured loan, CIT(A) deleted the addition after examining loan creditor&#039;s financial capacity through bank statements, income tax returns, and overdraft facility confirmation. ITAT found creditor&#039;s identity, creditworthiness, and transaction genuineness established through documentary evidence, sustaining CIT(A)&#039;s order deleting the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2024 17:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 267 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449116</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal in two matters. First, regarding weighted deduction u/s 35(2AB), assessee furnished Form 3CL from DSIR during appellate proceedings. CIT(A) allowed weighted deduction for approved expenditure and permitted remaining R&amp;amp;D expenses as revenue expenditure u/s 37. ITAT upheld this decision. Second, concerning addition u/s 68 for unsecured loan, CIT(A) deleted the addition after examining loan creditor&#039;s financial capacity through bank statements, income tax returns, and overdraft facility confirmation. ITAT found creditor&#039;s identity, creditworthiness, and transaction genuineness established through documentary evidence, sustaining CIT(A)&#039;s order deleting the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>