<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 261 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449110</link>
    <description>Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code cannot be used to enforce a foreign judgment or obtain monetary directions against a corporate debtor after the corporate insolvency resolution process has concluded and the resolution plan has been implemented. Claims not included in the approved resolution plan stand extinguished on approval, and they cannot later be pursued against the corporate debtor or its new management on a fresh-slate basis. The NCLAT noted that the reliefs sought were in substance enforcement of quantified sums, outside the permissible insolvency context, and held that excluded claims could not be revived after completion of the resolution process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2024 17:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 261 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449110</link>
      <description>Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code cannot be used to enforce a foreign judgment or obtain monetary directions against a corporate debtor after the corporate insolvency resolution process has concluded and the resolution plan has been implemented. Claims not included in the approved resolution plan stand extinguished on approval, and they cannot later be pursued against the corporate debtor or its new management on a fresh-slate basis. The NCLAT noted that the reliefs sought were in substance enforcement of quantified sums, outside the permissible insolvency context, and held that excluded claims could not be revived after completion of the resolution process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>