https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312183 Long, unexplained breach of the essential conditions of an industrial plot allotment justified resumption by the competent authority. The allotment was granted at concessional rates for industrial development, but the allottees failed for about twenty years to complete construction and commence production as required by the allotment terms. The SC accepted the concurrent findings of default, rejected the plea of hardship for want of sufficient cause, and held that reliance on other cases could not create negative equality under Article 14. In the absence of procedural illegality, serious infirmity, or manifest error, interference in writ jurisdiction was unwarranted and the resumption stood. en-us Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Feb 2024 08:19:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312183 Long, unexplained breach of the essential conditions of an industrial plot allotment justified resumption by the competent authority. The allotment was granted at concessional rates for industrial development, but the allottees failed for about twenty years to complete construction and commence production as required by the allotment terms. The SC accepted the concurrent findings of default, rejected the plea of hardship for want of sufficient cause, and held that reliance on other cases could not create negative equality under Article 14. In the absence of procedural illegality, serious infirmity, or manifest error, interference in writ jurisdiction was unwarranted and the resumption stood. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312183