https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312182 An election petition under the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act had to be filed within the statutory thirty-day period, and the scheme was treated as a complete code with no scope for condonation or extension. Because the right to challenge an election is purely statutory, strict compliance with the prescribed limitation was required, and Section 14 of the Limitation Act 1963 was excluded. Withdrawal of an earlier petition with liberty to file afresh did not revive the limitation period, so a fresh petition filed after expiry remained incompetent and barred by limitation. en-us Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Feb 2024 08:19:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312182 An election petition under the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act had to be filed within the statutory thirty-day period, and the scheme was treated as a complete code with no scope for condonation or extension. Because the right to challenge an election is purely statutory, strict compliance with the prescribed limitation was required, and Section 14 of the Limitation Act 1963 was excluded. Withdrawal of an earlier petition with liberty to file afresh did not revive the limitation period, so a fresh petition filed after expiry remained incompetent and barred by limitation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312182