https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312181 Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was declined where allegations of cheating and forgery disclosed prima facie participation in a racket involving forged property documents and receipt of money. The applicant was named by the complainant and public witnesses, appeared in video footage counting money, and had not joined or cooperated with the investigation. In view of the non-cooperation, issuance of non-bailable warrants and proceedings under Section 82 CrPC, the Court treated custodial interrogation as necessary and held that anticipatory bail could not be granted as a matter of course. The request was rejected. en-us Fri, 27 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Feb 2024 08:19:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312181 Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was declined where allegations of cheating and forgery disclosed prima facie participation in a racket involving forged property documents and receipt of money. The applicant was named by the complainant and public witnesses, appeared in video footage counting money, and had not joined or cooperated with the investigation. In view of the non-cooperation, issuance of non-bailable warrants and proceedings under Section 82 CrPC, the Court treated custodial interrogation as necessary and held that anticipatory bail could not be granted as a matter of course. The request was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 27 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312181