https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312178 The HC dismissed the review petition filed by the petitioner against Indian Bank, maintaining the original order. The petitioner sought a refund of the 25% auction deposit, citing an interim order by the DRT and financial difficulties due to the lockdown. The HC ruled that these arguments were not presented in the initial proceedings or included in the writ petition's prayer clause. The court emphasized that a review petition is not for rehearing and must be based on grounds presented in the original case. Consequently, the review petition was dismissed, and the original order remained unchanged. en-us Fri, 18 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Feb 2024 08:19:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312178 The HC dismissed the review petition filed by the petitioner against Indian Bank, maintaining the original order. The petitioner sought a refund of the 25% auction deposit, citing an interim order by the DRT and financial difficulties due to the lockdown. The HC ruled that these arguments were not presented in the initial proceedings or included in the writ petition's prayer clause. The court emphasized that a review petition is not for rehearing and must be based on grounds presented in the original case. Consequently, the review petition was dismissed, and the original order remained unchanged. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312178