https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312169 A challenge to cancellation of an industrial allotment and eviction failed where the petitioner, relying on a later amalgamation, could not establish locus standi after the original allottee's non-compliance with allotment conditions. The allotment had already been cancelled for failure to commence and complete construction within the stipulated time, and no convincing explanation was offered for the project's non-implementation. The Madras HC noted that writ interference with action taken by a statutory corporation is limited and will not be granted absent a clear statutory infraction or proof that the action is arbitrary, unreasonable, or unfair. On these facts, no illegality or unreasonableness was shown, so judicial intervention was not warranted. en-us Mon, 12 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Feb 2024 15:03:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312169 A challenge to cancellation of an industrial allotment and eviction failed where the petitioner, relying on a later amalgamation, could not establish locus standi after the original allottee's non-compliance with allotment conditions. The allotment had already been cancelled for failure to commence and complete construction within the stipulated time, and no convincing explanation was offered for the project's non-implementation. The Madras HC noted that writ interference with action taken by a statutory corporation is limited and will not be granted absent a clear statutory infraction or proof that the action is arbitrary, unreasonable, or unfair. On these facts, no illegality or unreasonableness was shown, so judicial intervention was not warranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312169