https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312168 A writ court should not interfere with a notice or resumption action arising from an allotment and lease governed by contractual conditions where the dispute concerns enforcement of private law terms. The text states that the allottee breached stipulated conditions on utilisation and commencement of construction, and that such contractual interpretation and alleged breach do not ordinarily justify Article 226 review unless there is a statutory violation or clear unfairness. Interference was declined, the writ petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was given liberty to submit an explanation within the extended time granted. en-us Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Feb 2024 15:03:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312168 A writ court should not interfere with a notice or resumption action arising from an allotment and lease governed by contractual conditions where the dispute concerns enforcement of private law terms. The text states that the allottee breached stipulated conditions on utilisation and commencement of construction, and that such contractual interpretation and alleged breach do not ordinarily justify Article 226 review unless there is a statutory violation or clear unfairness. Interference was declined, the writ petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was given liberty to submit an explanation within the extended time granted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312168