<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty should not be imposed for mentioning wrong vehicle number with a difference of three digits in E-Way Bill</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=12285</link>
    <description>A typographical discrepancy in the e-way bill vehicle number was treated as a minor irregularity; absent material establishing intent to evade tax, the mens rea requirement for imposing penalty under the CGST framework is not met, and administrative penalty orders proceeding solely on such clerical error lack jurisdictional justification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2024 08:48:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2024 08:48:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742459" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty should not be imposed for mentioning wrong vehicle number with a difference of three digits in E-Way Bill</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=12285</link>
      <description>A typographical discrepancy in the e-way bill vehicle number was treated as a minor irregularity; absent material establishing intent to evade tax, the mens rea requirement for imposing penalty under the CGST framework is not met, and administrative penalty orders proceeding solely on such clerical error lack jurisdictional justification.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Goods and Services Tax - GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2024 08:48:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=12285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>