https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312164 Delhi HC disposed of petition regarding seizure of imported Gold Dore bars. Petitioner claimed entitlement to import under 2008 notification but never sought amendment of import conditions when subsequent 2012 and 2017 notifications were issued. Court held petitioner cannot now contend later notifications don't apply, rejecting argument for import solely under 2008 notification. Since customs duty was paid under protest and provisional release application filed, court directed respondent to consider and dispose of provisional release application within three weeks. All parties' contentions on merits kept open. en-us Thu, 06 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Feb 2024 08:47:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312164 Delhi HC disposed of petition regarding seizure of imported Gold Dore bars. Petitioner claimed entitlement to import under 2008 notification but never sought amendment of import conditions when subsequent 2012 and 2017 notifications were issued. Court held petitioner cannot now contend later notifications don't apply, rejecting argument for import solely under 2008 notification. Since customs duty was paid under protest and provisional release application filed, court directed respondent to consider and dispose of provisional release application within three weeks. All parties' contentions on merits kept open. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 06 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312164