<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 239 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449088</link>
    <description>HC reviewed a tax registration cancellation case challenging retrospective revocation from 01.07.2017. The court identified procedural irregularities in the digital signature and notice issuance. Acknowledging systemic issues, the HC granted exemption to the petitioner, directing officials to address notice and order deficiencies. A video conference was scheduled to discuss remedial actions, emphasizing the need for procedural compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2025 10:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 239 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449088</link>
      <description>HC reviewed a tax registration cancellation case challenging retrospective revocation from 01.07.2017. The court identified procedural irregularities in the digital signature and notice issuance. Acknowledging systemic issues, the HC granted exemption to the petitioner, directing officials to address notice and order deficiencies. A video conference was scheduled to discuss remedial actions, emphasizing the need for procedural compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>