<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 237 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449086</link>
    <description>The HC quashed an order by tax authorities against a construction company for violating Section 75(4) of CGST Act and natural justice principles. The court found the order was issued without a mandatory personal hearing, despite revealing a tax liability of Rs. 20.02 crore. The judgment directed authorities to provide a personal hearing and issue a revised order within four weeks, emphasizing procedural fairness in tax proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2025 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 237 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449086</link>
      <description>The HC quashed an order by tax authorities against a construction company for violating Section 75(4) of CGST Act and natural justice principles. The court found the order was issued without a mandatory personal hearing, despite revealing a tax liability of Rs. 20.02 crore. The judgment directed authorities to provide a personal hearing and issue a revised order within four weeks, emphasizing procedural fairness in tax proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>