<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 219 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449068</link>
    <description>The ITAT, Raipur allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for AY 2009-10. The penalty was initially confirmed by the CIT(A) based on a quantum addition by the AO, which was later vacated by the ITAT. Since the basis for the penalty no longer existed, the penalty was deemed arbitrary and unsustainable, leading to its deletion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2024 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 219 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449068</link>
      <description>The ITAT, Raipur allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for AY 2009-10. The penalty was initially confirmed by the CIT(A) based on a quantum addition by the AO, which was later vacated by the ITAT. Since the basis for the penalty no longer existed, the penalty was deemed arbitrary and unsustainable, leading to its deletion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>