<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 210 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449059</link>
    <description>The CESTAT New Delhi ruled in favor of a customs broker facing penalties for illegal export of prohibited goods. While fraud occurred through document manipulation by the broker&#039;s employee, no evidence showed the broker&#039;s knowledge or connivance. The HC found the broker violated regulations by failing to verify the exporter&#039;s address and authorization. Applying proportionality doctrine, the tribunal reduced the penalty from security deposit forfeiture to Rs. 50,000, noting the broker took immediate action against the employee. The revenue&#039;s appeal for license revocation was dismissed as no mala fide conduct was established against the broker.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2024 18:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 210 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449059</link>
      <description>The CESTAT New Delhi ruled in favor of a customs broker facing penalties for illegal export of prohibited goods. While fraud occurred through document manipulation by the broker&#039;s employee, no evidence showed the broker&#039;s knowledge or connivance. The HC found the broker violated regulations by failing to verify the exporter&#039;s address and authorization. Applying proportionality doctrine, the tribunal reduced the penalty from security deposit forfeiture to Rs. 50,000, noting the broker took immediate action against the employee. The revenue&#039;s appeal for license revocation was dismissed as no mala fide conduct was established against the broker.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>