<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 207 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449056</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the enhanced penalty of Rs.50,000 imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) for the late submission of import documents, reinstating the original penalty of Rs.5,000 per Bill of Entry imposed by the Assistant Commissioner. The Tribunal found that the penalty enhancement was unjustified, referencing a precedent that penalties for procedural delays without revenue implications should be reasonable. The appeal by the appellant was allowed, and the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was deemed unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 18:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 207 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449056</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the enhanced penalty of Rs.50,000 imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) for the late submission of import documents, reinstating the original penalty of Rs.5,000 per Bill of Entry imposed by the Assistant Commissioner. The Tribunal found that the penalty enhancement was unjustified, referencing a precedent that penalties for procedural delays without revenue implications should be reasonable. The appeal by the appellant was allowed, and the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was deemed unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>