<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 195 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449044</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court corrected an inadvertent record that had shown the assessee&#039;s appeals as withdrawn by the Revenue, and noted that a separate withdrawal application had been filed so the assessee could participate in the Sabka Vishwas Scheme, 2019. With no objection from the Revenue, the Court permitted withdrawal of the civil appeals for that purpose. The applications were allowed and the appeals stood withdrawn.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2024 08:42:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 195 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449044</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court corrected an inadvertent record that had shown the assessee&#039;s appeals as withdrawn by the Revenue, and noted that a separate withdrawal application had been filed so the assessee could participate in the Sabka Vishwas Scheme, 2019. With no objection from the Revenue, the Court permitted withdrawal of the civil appeals for that purpose. The applications were allowed and the appeals stood withdrawn.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>