https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312162 A conviction based on circumstantial evidence and an extra-judicial confession was upheld because the proved circumstances formed a complete chain pointing only to the accused's guilt, including fabricated signatures, unexplained transactions, and possession of the deceased's ring, even after excluding disputed recovery evidence. The appellate request to adduce additional evidence under Section 391 CrPC was rejected because the accused had already raised the same defence at trial, the proposed forensic material could have been produced earlier, and it would not have altered the evidentiary position. The conviction, sentence, and dismissal of the appeal were affirmed. en-us Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Feb 2024 18:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312162 A conviction based on circumstantial evidence and an extra-judicial confession was upheld because the proved circumstances formed a complete chain pointing only to the accused's guilt, including fabricated signatures, unexplained transactions, and possession of the deceased's ring, even after excluding disputed recovery evidence. The appellate request to adduce additional evidence under Section 391 CrPC was rejected because the accused had already raised the same defence at trial, the proposed forensic material could have been produced earlier, and it would not have altered the evidentiary position. The conviction, sentence, and dismissal of the appeal were affirmed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312162