https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312161 Judicial review under Articles 226 and 227 remains available against Armed Forces Tribunal orders because it forms part of the Constitution's basic structure and is not displaced by Article 33 or Article 227(4). The statutory appeal mechanism under Sections 30 and 31 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 is limited and does not constitute an equally efficacious substitute in every case, particularly for challenges involving service conditions, interlocutory orders, or alleged jurisdictional error, illegality, perversity, arbitrariness, or breach of natural justice. The document concludes that writ petitions against Armed Forces Tribunal orders remain maintainable in appropriate cases. en-us Tue, 15 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Feb 2024 19:23:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312161 Judicial review under Articles 226 and 227 remains available against Armed Forces Tribunal orders because it forms part of the Constitution's basic structure and is not displaced by Article 33 or Article 227(4). The statutory appeal mechanism under Sections 30 and 31 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 is limited and does not constitute an equally efficacious substitute in every case, particularly for challenges involving service conditions, interlocutory orders, or alleged jurisdictional error, illegality, perversity, arbitrariness, or breach of natural justice. The document concludes that writ petitions against Armed Forces Tribunal orders remain maintainable in appropriate cases. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 15 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312161