https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312159 Additional evidence relating to adjoining acquisition was admitted because the award, Aks Shajra and site plan were relevant to market value and were not opposed by the State, helping identify the acquired land's location and true worth. In determining compensation, the acquired land's high potential near the Delhi border and developed localities justified reliance on later judicial assessments for neighbouring land, while the State's sale deeds were excluded as undervalued or distress transactions. Applying the principle that landowners are entitled to the best price and just compensation must reflect real market value, the compensation was enhanced to the uniform rate with consequential statutory benefits. en-us Tue, 24 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Feb 2024 19:23:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312159 Additional evidence relating to adjoining acquisition was admitted because the award, Aks Shajra and site plan were relevant to market value and were not opposed by the State, helping identify the acquired land's location and true worth. In determining compensation, the acquired land's high potential near the Delhi border and developed localities justified reliance on later judicial assessments for neighbouring land, while the State's sale deeds were excluded as undervalued or distress transactions. Applying the principle that landowners are entitled to the best price and just compensation must reflect real market value, the compensation was enhanced to the uniform rate with consequential statutory benefits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 24 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312159