<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 1253 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312146</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(A) which had confirmed the disallowance of the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction towards travelling expenses. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) failed to consider a submission made by the assessee justifying the expenses. Consequently, the case was remitted back for fresh consideration, granting the assessee another opportunity to present its case. The appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2024 10:55:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 1253 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312146</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(A) which had confirmed the disallowance of the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction towards travelling expenses. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) failed to consider a submission made by the assessee justifying the expenses. Consequently, the case was remitted back for fresh consideration, granting the assessee another opportunity to present its case. The appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>