<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 185 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449034</link>
    <description>HC allowed writ petition challenging GST penalty for transporting goods without e-way bill. Court quashed impugned orders, citing Division Bench precedent regarding e-way bill requirement&#039;s enforceability. Directed refund of deposited amount within one month, effectively providing relief to the petitioner by setting aside penalty and appeal dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2025 10:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 185 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449034</link>
      <description>HC allowed writ petition challenging GST penalty for transporting goods without e-way bill. Court quashed impugned orders, citing Division Bench precedent regarding e-way bill requirement&#039;s enforceability. Directed refund of deposited amount within one month, effectively providing relief to the petitioner by setting aside penalty and appeal dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>