<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (1) TMI 38 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35690</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee and against the revenue, finding the disallowance of interest, commission, stamp charges, and penalties unjustified. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions to disallow these deductions and impose penalties were overturned based on settlement agreements under voluntary disclosure schemes, which covered all borrowings. The Court ordered the Commissioner to pay the costs of the reference to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:27:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (1) TMI 38 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35690</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee and against the revenue, finding the disallowance of interest, commission, stamp charges, and penalties unjustified. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions to disallow these deductions and impose penalties were overturned based on settlement agreements under voluntary disclosure schemes, which covered all borrowings. The Court ordered the Commissioner to pay the costs of the reference to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>