https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449027 A scrutiny notice under section 61 of the Karnataka GST Act sought an explanation for return discrepancies, and the petitioner had filed a reply. The reply was not considered and no order was passed on it, so the High Court directed the respondent to examine the reply and issue appropriate orders within one month, with liberty to the petitioner to submit additional material before the authority. The key legal point is that a reply to a scrutiny notice must be considered before consequential action is taken. en-us Fri, 12 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Apr 2025 11:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449027 A scrutiny notice under section 61 of the Karnataka GST Act sought an explanation for return discrepancies, and the petitioner had filed a reply. The reply was not considered and no order was passed on it, so the High Court directed the respondent to examine the reply and issue appropriate orders within one month, with liberty to the petitioner to submit additional material before the authority. The key legal point is that a reply to a scrutiny notice must be considered before consequential action is taken. Case-Laws GST Fri, 12 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449027