<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 140 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448989</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) that rejected the appellant&#039;s appeal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as applied to service tax under Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994. After the appellant made the necessary pre-deposit, the Tribunal remanded the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on merits, directing that the appeal be decided within two months. The appeal was allowed by way of remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2024 08:24:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 140 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448989</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) that rejected the appellant&#039;s appeal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as applied to service tax under Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994. After the appellant made the necessary pre-deposit, the Tribunal remanded the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on merits, directing that the appeal be decided within two months. The appeal was allowed by way of remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>