<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1376 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312143</link>
    <description>After the 1984 amendment to Section 25 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, compensation is not confined to the amount claimed by the landowner; the earlier ceiling was removed and only the minimum safeguard against falling below the Collector&#039;s award remains. Applying that principle, the SC assessed the acquired land on its own facts and rejected parity with higher-valued highway-side comparables because the property was away from the national highway and had limited access. The Court nonetheless found the State&#039;s valuation too low and fixed the market value at Rs. 200 per square yard, with statutory benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 21:38:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1376 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312143</link>
      <description>After the 1984 amendment to Section 25 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, compensation is not confined to the amount claimed by the landowner; the earlier ceiling was removed and only the minimum safeguard against falling below the Collector&#039;s award remains. Applying that principle, the SC assessed the acquired land on its own facts and rejected parity with higher-valued highway-side comparables because the property was away from the national highway and had limited access. The Court nonetheless found the State&#039;s valuation too low and fixed the market value at Rs. 200 per square yard, with statutory benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>