<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1482 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312140</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC found that the order disposing objections to a notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act did not consider all submissions made by the petitioner. It quashed and set aside the order and directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the objections in accordance with law after granting a personal hearing. The court made no observation on the merits of the reopening.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 21:38:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1482 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312140</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC found that the order disposing objections to a notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act did not consider all submissions made by the petitioner. It quashed and set aside the order and directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the objections in accordance with law after granting a personal hearing. The court made no observation on the merits of the reopening.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>