https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312127 Under a revisional power framed around legality and propriety, the High Court may reappraise evidence and disturb factual findings where they are legally infirm, so it was competent to interfere with the Appellate Authority's conclusions. On the eviction merits, the landlords' bona fide requirement for additional accommodation was upheld because the need was found genuine and reasonable, and later developments could be considered without displacing the finding of insufficient accommodation. The appeal therefore failed, and the eviction order was restored. en-us Mon, 09 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Aug 2024 16:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312127 Under a revisional power framed around legality and propriety, the High Court may reappraise evidence and disturb factual findings where they are legally infirm, so it was competent to interfere with the Appellate Authority's conclusions. On the eviction merits, the landlords' bona fide requirement for additional accommodation was upheld because the need was found genuine and reasonable, and later developments could be considered without displacing the finding of insufficient accommodation. The appeal therefore failed, and the eviction order was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 09 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312127