https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312126 Under the unamended land acquisition law, compensation in reference or appeal could not exceed the amount claimed where a Section 9 notice had been issued, so enhancement beyond the claim was unsustainable. The 1984 amendment to interest on enhanced compensation was held not retrospective; because the award fell under the pre-amendment regime, only 6% interest was admissible and the higher rates of 9% and 15% were set aside. The review challenge failed because it sought reconsideration of valuation and did not disclose any error justifying reopening of the enhancement. en-us Fri, 29 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Feb 2024 10:22:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312126 Under the unamended land acquisition law, compensation in reference or appeal could not exceed the amount claimed where a Section 9 notice had been issued, so enhancement beyond the claim was unsustainable. The 1984 amendment to interest on enhanced compensation was held not retrospective; because the award fell under the pre-amendment regime, only 6% interest was admissible and the higher rates of 9% and 15% were set aside. The review challenge failed because it sought reconsideration of valuation and did not disclose any error justifying reopening of the enhancement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 29 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312126