<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 135 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448984</link>
    <description>HC found that the Joint Director (CGST) (Appeals) exceeded statutory powers by remanding the case to the original adjudicating authority. The court set aside the order, determining that under Section 107(11) of CGST Act, 2017, the appeal authority cannot refer cases back. Despite Revenue&#039;s objection, the writ petition was deemed maintainable due to the absence of a constituted Tribunal, and the matter was directed for fresh consideration by the appeal authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2025 10:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 135 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448984</link>
      <description>HC found that the Joint Director (CGST) (Appeals) exceeded statutory powers by remanding the case to the original adjudicating authority. The court set aside the order, determining that under Section 107(11) of CGST Act, 2017, the appeal authority cannot refer cases back. Despite Revenue&#039;s objection, the writ petition was deemed maintainable due to the absence of a constituted Tribunal, and the matter was directed for fresh consideration by the appeal authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>