<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 130 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448979</link>
    <description>HC dismissed writ petition challenging GST show cause notice. Court held that audit report validly supports action under Section 74 CGST Act without mandatory fraud findings. Amended Rule 142(1) applies prospectively, and consolidated financial statements can be used for tax assessment. Petitioner permitted to respond to notice without cost implications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2025 10:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 130 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448979</link>
      <description>HC dismissed writ petition challenging GST show cause notice. Court held that audit report validly supports action under Section 74 CGST Act without mandatory fraud findings. Amended Rule 142(1) applies prospectively, and consolidated financial statements can be used for tax assessment. Petitioner permitted to respond to notice without cost implications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>