<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (10) TMI 15 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35678</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal&#039;s finding that part of the salary paid to two employees was attributable to extra commercial considerations gave rise to a question of law. It therefore allowed the application under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and directed the Tribunal to state the case and refer the specified question to the High Court. The court did not examine the merits of the salary disallowance and confined itself to the reference issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:37:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (10) TMI 15 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35678</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal&#039;s finding that part of the salary paid to two employees was attributable to extra commercial considerations gave rise to a question of law. It therefore allowed the application under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and directed the Tribunal to state the case and refer the specified question to the High Court. The court did not examine the merits of the salary disallowance and confined itself to the reference issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>