<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 127 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448976</link>
    <description>Central GST authorities were restrained from proceeding with a later show cause notice where State GST authorities had already initiated proceedings on the same subject-matter, as section 6(2)(b) of the GST enactments bars parallel proceedings by different tax authorities. The notices related to the same period and the same alleged wrongful availment of input tax credit under section 16(4), so the later Central notice was kept in abeyance until the next date of listing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2025 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 127 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448976</link>
      <description>Central GST authorities were restrained from proceeding with a later show cause notice where State GST authorities had already initiated proceedings on the same subject-matter, as section 6(2)(b) of the GST enactments bars parallel proceedings by different tax authorities. The notices related to the same period and the same alleged wrongful availment of input tax credit under section 16(4), so the later Central notice was kept in abeyance until the next date of listing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>